Pad vs Galaxy Tab smackdown[Updated Aug 2. Before launching into this review, which pits Samsung’s Galaxy Tab 1. Apple’s i. Pad 2, I took a few days to familiarize myself with the Galaxy Tab’s Android 3. Honeycomb”) OS. The thing is, I’d already used i. OS on an i. Pod Touch for two years, but was a rank newbie when it came to Android. Note: Originally published in July 2. Among many other enhancements, specs for Apple’s “New i. Pad” (aka i. Pad 3) and Samsung’s Galaxy Tab 2 1. Samsung tablet’s mid- 2. Android 4. 0 (aka “ice cream sandwich”) are now included. First impressions. 5-Way Optimization by Dual Intelligent Processors 5 – One click, total system optimization! M.2 & SATA Express - Speed up your system with lightning-fast 10Gb/s. Unfortunately, after configuring the Galaxy Tab 1. Android Market, and becoming accustomed to its operation, it dawned on me that I’d allowed myself to slide down a slippery slope into an Android Abyss from which there would be no escape. Apple’s obsession with tightly controlling everything in and around its products imposes a high level of rigidity in the look, feel, and functionality of the i. Pad. Consequently, all i. Pads are essentially identical, beyond the wallpapers and apps their owners install on them. In contrast, thanks to Android’s greater empowerment of its apps, I was easily able to mold the Galaxy Tab 1. I haven’t a clue how to accomplish on an i. OS device. Samsung’s thin, lightweight, Galaxy Tab 1. Apple’s i. Pad 2. Now, that’s not necessarily best for everyone. In fact, Apple’s more tightly constrained systems are generally credited with being more stable and less prone to hardware/software and OS/app incompatibilities and mishaps, than less restricted systems. But if you value flexibility, configurability, and the ability to control many characteristics of your device — like I do — Android may be a preferred platform. In that case, the Galaxy Tab 1. Pad. At this point, I only turn to the i. Pad when in need of a specific app that’s not available on the Galaxy Tab 1. Netflix video streaming and Skype video calling come to mind, although I’m sure there will be others. Update: Both Netflix and Skype, including video calling, are now working perfectly on the Galaxy Tab 1. Galaxy Tab 1. 0. 1 and i. Pad similarities.
Overall, both 1. 0- inch tablets have a similar look and feel, and they implement comparable features. These include: Convenient access to Facebook, Twitter, discussion forums, and other social networks. Excellent web browsers, email, and calendar apps. Tons of free and paid games. Great apps for leveraging online resources such as maps, shopping, news sites, dictionaries, language translators, Wikipedia, etc. A choice of free e- book readers, with easy downloads of both free and paid books. Ability to watch movies and shows streamed from both free and fee- based online video aggregation services (e. You. Tube, Netflix, Amazon, Vudu, Hulu Plus, Crackle, etc.). Peripherals and apps for taking photos and videos, making voice and video calls, recording audio, and playing music. Deciding between the alternatives. In light of their price parity — the Galaxy Tab 1. Pad 2 each cost $4. March 2. 01. 2) — and the fact that the i. Pad is more mature and commands substantially more marketshare than all 1. Android tablets combined, most consumers will likely select the i. Pad over the Galaxy Tab 1. To be sure, the i. Pad does everything most consumers want, and does so to near- perfection. On the other hand, if you want greater control over your tablet environment, more openness to non- Apple standards (such as Adobe Flash), or greater ability to adapt to new technologies and standards as they emerge, the Galaxy Tab 1. But don’t decide yet! Below you’ll find…A comparison of Galaxy Tab 1. Pad features and specs. General observations regarding Galaxy Tab 1. An extensive Galaxy Tab 1. A list of my main Galaxy Tab 1. Some parting comments. Comparison of features and specs. The table below compares the key features and specs of the Galaxy Tab 1. Galaxy Tab 2 1. 0. May, 2. 01. 2), i. Pad 2, and New i. Pad (introduced in March, 2. The models tabulated are all Wi. Fi- only versions. Galaxy Tab and Tab 2 1. Pad 2 and New i. Pad. Galaxy Tab 1. 0. 1. Galaxy Tab 2 1. 0. Pad 2“New i. Pad”Model. GT- P7. 51. 0 (Wi. Fi only version)GT- P5. Wi. Fi only version)MC7. LL (Wi. Fi only version)(Wi. Fi only version)OSAndroid 4. Android 4. 0i. OS 5. OS 5. 1. Processor. GHz dual- core Nvidia Tegra 2 with ARM Cortex 9 CPUs; Ge. Force GPU1. GHz dual- core ARM CPU; GPU1. GHz dual- core Apple A5 ARM CPU with dual- core graphics. GHz dual- core Apple A5. X ARM CPU with quad- core graphics. Memory. 1GB RAM; 1. GB flash. 1GB RAM; 1. GB flash; micro. SD exp. MB RAM; 1. 6GB flash. GB RAM; 1. 6/3. 2/6. GB flash. Display. Gorilla Glass. 9. Camerasfront 2. MP; rear 3. MP with 7. 20p recording and LED flashfront 0. MP (6. 40×4. 80); rear 3. MP with 7. 20p recordingfront 0. MP (6. 40×4. 80); rear 1. MP with 7. 20p recording; 3. MP (6. 40×4. 80); rear 5. MP with 1. 08. 0p recording; 3. Speakersstereomonostereo. Video formats supported. H. 2. 64, H. 2. 63, Xvi. D, WMV7/8, VP8, MP4. VC- 1 format: 3. GP (MP4), WMV (asf), AVIH. AAC- LC audio in . MPEG- 4 video in m. M- JPEG with audio in ulaw, PCM stereo audio in . Audio formats supported. MP3, OGG, AAC, AAC+, e. AAC+, WAV, AMR, MID, IMY, WMA, Vorbis, RTTTL/RTX, OTAHE- AAC (V1/V2), AAC, Protected AAC, MP3, MP3 VBR, Audible (formats 2, 3, 4, Audible Enhanced Audio, AAX, AAX+), Apple Lossless, AIFF, WAVWireless. Wifi (8. 02. 1. 1a/b/g/n); Bluetooth 2. Wifi (8. 02. 1. 1a/b/g/n); Bluetooth 2. Wifi (8. 02. 1. 1a/b/g/n); Bluetooth 4. Location. GPSDigital compass (no GPS on wifi- only models)I/O expansion. . Proprietary dock port (USB, sound, video, power); 3.I/OProprietary dock port (USB, sound, video, power); 3.I/OBattery. 70. 00m.AH 3. 7. V Li- polymer.AH 3. 8. V Li- polymer. Ah 3. 8. V Li- polymer. Dimensions. 10. 1 x 6. Weight. 19. 9 oz. Retail price (1. 6GB flash)$4. Unboxing the Galaxy Tab 1. Unboxing the Galaxy Tab 1. Now, for a few observations regarding various Galaxy Tab 1.Home screens. Here’s a look at the Galaxy Tab 1.Android 3. 1 OS: Default Galaxy Tab 1. Free Pacman Game With No Download . And here they are after customizing the home screen wallpaper and adding various apps from the Android Market: Lock and home screens with customized wallpaper and various downloaded apps(click thumbnails to enlarge)This next group of screenshots shows the Galaxy Tab 1.Android 4. 0: Default primary homescreen, pop- up status panel, unlock screens (click thumbnails to enlarge; screenshots reflect the Android 4. My Life Story Adventures Setup . Starting from the tablet’s August 2.Touch. Wiz and continuing with its mid- 2.Android 4. 0 upgrade, the Galaxy Tab 1. They remain in the foreground — in front of normal apps — until you close them. Android 4. 0 update)Additionally, the Galaxy Tab 1. Android 4. 0 upgrade introduced a built- in folder function, shown in the screenshots below.(click thumbnails to enlarge; screenshots reflect the Android 4. Comparison of Galaxy Tab 1. Pad 2 homescreens. The following two sets of screenshots compare the primary home screens of the Galaxy Tab 1. Pad 2 (right pair) after each tablet has had its home screen wallpaper modified and a screen or two of apps installed. See if you can spot some interesting differences…Galaxy Tab 1. Pad 2 (right pair) home screens(click thumbnails to enlarge)A few noteworthy differences in the home screens and icons include: The i. Pad 2 holds 2. 5 app or folder icons per screen, five of which are constant across all home screens since they’re located on the system tray. The Galaxy Tab 1. The tablet’s initial Android 3. OS did not include a built- in option for organizing home screen icons into folders, although a highly flexible home screen folder capability was available via an Android app (discussed below). Additionally, the tablet’s mid- 2. Android 4. 0 firmware upgrade added a built- in folder function. The Galaxy Tab 1. The i. Pad 2 changes from a 4×5 to a 5×4 array (not including the 1×5 tray) when you rotate the device from landscape to portrait orientation; this alters the location of apps and folders (other than what’s in the tray) on the home screen, other than the upper- left and lower- right corners, making it harder to locate specific apps when you rotate the screen between its two modes. It’s surprising that Apple would tolerate this level of UI inconsistency; however, it keeps horizontal/vertical icon spacing constant across the two orientations, so perhaps this is a case of style trumping substance. Personally, I prefer the Galaxy Tab 1. Pad’s “airy” approach.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
October 2017
Categories |